Cut Him No Slack

Do not buy into the narrative:

“Well, President Obama inherited the largest set of problems of any president in history, perhaps except FDR and maybe Abraham Lincoln…” (Wasserman-Schultz)

“…Obama reiterated that he had inherited the worst economy since the Great Depression…” (Robert Reich)

The excuse of inheriting a bad situation is simply another false narrative being foisted upon the public by those who ought to know better (and undoubtedly do). 

Barack Obama sought the job of the Presidency with his eyes wide open. It doesn’t matter what he inherited. He knew he was going to inherit it. He wanted it. He applied for the job, actively interviewing across all 57 states. He had the best advisors the Chicago political machine money could buy.

In short he spent $750 million dollarsyes, 3/4 of a billion dollars — and nearly two years convincing the American people that he wanted the job, that he understood the problems we were facing, and that he knew how to fix them.

He knew the situation was bad when, in his arrogance he said, “[I]f I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition.” The next year he was singing the same hubristic tune, warbling his preference to be  “[A] really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president.” Of course, he will be neither.

So when I heard Paul Ryan earlier this month say, “No one disputes President Obama inherited a difficult situation…” I cringed.

Of course no one disputes it. It doesn’t come into play one way other the other, except as the Left would have you believe.

Obama is not just moving the goal posts, he’s trying to re-define the entire playing field to suit himself. Don’t allow it, don’t play into it. America can’t afford it.

Cut him no slack.

Stoutcat

About these ads

4 Responses to Cut Him No Slack

  1. DT says:

    Even though Paul Ryan is nothing but BIG Government FAKE Conservative which the so-called Conservative Sheeple IGNORE his Unconservative Voting Record, he almost…I mean almost told the TRUTH. He caught himself, stopped short and blamed everyone but himself and the Republicans. By doing that, he LIED.

    • DT says:

      All Ryan and Romney have to do is SAY I’m a Conservative and the Sheeple will believe them. They TOTALLY IGNORE their Voting Records.

  2. DT says:

    From Doug Wead’s Blog

    Romney’s Revenge

    “It ain’t easy being green”

    - Kermit the Frog

    It ain’t easy being LDS, especially when you are running for president and 48% of the country claim to be born again Christians and many of them have been hostile to your Mormon religion, labeling it a cult. Getting the nomination takes a bit of genius, or an act of God, since the path starts with a march through the cornfields of Iowa, where “born againers” lay in wait and reaches its crescendo in the South on Super Tuesday, where evangelical Southern States dominate.

    I experienced this bias against Mormons during my work in the White House. I was trying to get the Medal of Freedom for Ezra Taft Benson when fellow staffers who were LDS pulled me aside and said, “Don’t even try.” (It finally happened for Gordon Hinckley.)

    And so, while John McCain was launching his general election campaign at the Republican Convention in 2008, the Mitt Romney forces were busy re-writing the rules for 2012. They were trying to dethrone Iowa where they had been easily taken out in the last minute by evangelical Governor Mike Huckabee, seeing a year of work and millions of dollars go down the drain.

    Under their new rules, LDS states like Arizona, Nevada and Colorado were eventually moved up. They broke up the South. Now it would vote in different parts on different weeks and the states themselves made proportional, so that if Romney did not win one, he would still get something added to his aggregate total.

    If Mitt Romney lost a primary in 2012, as he would numerous times, he could still bag the bulk of the delegates through a selection process. This would require an organization. And that would require money, which he had. Delegates would have to attend caucus meetings where they would be elected to go to county conventions where they would have to win election to state conventions. So in the Rules Committee at the RNC in 2008, with all eyes focused on McCain, Romney quietly began his campaign to win the 2012 nomination.

    In some cases it worked well. For example, in North Dakota, Romney came in third place behind Santorum and Ron Paul in the primary but nevertheless captured 60% of the delegates at the state convention. But time and again, the pesky Ron Paul folks showed up, unexpectedly, and they had real people. In the end, Romney had to “cheat” to even hang onto his own Massachusetts, home state delegation.

    At the RNC this week, the Romney folks sought a better plan, a way to ensure that a president Romney could be re-nominated in 2016 without embarrassment. Or even if he lost to Obama. He would own the 2016 nomination anyway and get to try again against Hillary Clinton.

    The first version of Romney Rules, called for the nominee, himself, to pick all of the delegates in any state where he won the primary. This was what Romney wanted. This would have turned the RNC into one big fundraiser. Pay enough money and the nominee will let you be his delegate from Missouri. it would have gutted the Republican Party, ending all sense of ownership or participation from the grass roots. Conventions would not matter since they would have no business to conduct. And no one would have an incentive to go door to door campaigning, unless you can talk millionaires into doing that.

    They also tried to take out Iowa as the first in the nation caucus. Iowa was a pesky “born again” state that seemed to go for anybody but Romney, even when they owned the state chairman, who this time subverted the vote count in key counties, guaranteeing that Romney could at least have the win for those first few weeks when sequential wins have power and significance for the now hapless, clueless, corporate run media. But the effort to gut Iowa failed.

    What Romney got instead, at this year’s RNC, with his own personal envoys, Ben Ginsburg and John Sununu directing, was a plan that allowed states to pick their delegates but bound them to the beauty contest vote. In some respects it was the way it had been before the Romney folks had changed the rules to suit themselves. And it only passed because Morton Blackwell and other astute Republican leaders where kept away from the convention by hijacked buses that circled for hours, with delegates screaming, “Let us off this bus.”

    And they got something more. Something bigger. They got the right for the RNC to change the rules right up to the next convention. Which gives them time to purge existing members and reshape the RNC to its purposes. It also allows them to change the results, if someone other than Romney wins.

    In fact, they didn’t wait. They began using this power to purge the floor of Ron Paul delegates. But there was a big problem. Almost all of the Hispanics, African Americans and homosexuals on the floor were Ron Paul supporters. (African Americans? Yep, you will have to Google “Ron Paul and cocaine laws stacked against minorities,” to understand Ron Paul’s following among African Americans.)

    Do they kick out Ashley Ryan, the youngest member of the RNC, the National Committee Woman from Maine? They tried. Sununu was furious that she had stood up to him in the Rules Committee. It was not an easy choice to make but they had to thin the heard, the floor noise was embarrassing, so among those kicked out were seven Afghanistan War Veterans, including one who had been home from the war only months. That’s okay, the Vets are tough. And the media has no spine. it will be ignored.

    To give you an idea of how “narrow the door” into the RNC has now become, the hated evangelical Christians are clearly in disfavor. (Remember, according to Gallup, 48% of the nation claims to be born again.)

    Sarah Palin? No way. Not anymore. She has been blackballed. Too born again. And a woman. Not even Michelle Bachman, who earned her spot at the podium and had to be crying behind her radiant smile.

    There were nine Catholics and one born again Christian among the first speakers. The exception was Ted Cruz, a Southern Baptist, who only “snuck” through the censors because everyone assumed that he had to be Catholic, after all he was Hispanic, wasn’t he? As the Romney folk will learn, Catholic Hispanics are Democrat. The vast communities of Pentecostal Hispanics are Republican. They will need the hated evangelicals if they expect any Hispanics at all. And then, a couple days later there was Tim Pawlenty, who was, yes, born again but a very early and fervent supporter of Romney and a man.

    Evangelical Mike Huckabee was allowed to speak but not before a fight. Romney wants Republican Senate candidate, Todd Akin of Missouri, a Southern Baptist Christian, who recently misspoke on the abortion issue, replaced as the GOP Senate Candidate. (So much for Ronald Reagan’s Eleventh Commandment.) According to a close friend, Huckabee was told to stop campaigning for fellow Republican, Akin, or you can’t speak at the RNC. Huckabee refused and the Romney campaign, who has no other evangelical in its stable, backed down.

    It’s not easy being green, especially when you are taking much needed, “legitimate” revenge against all those who have hurt you. As psychologists say, “Hurt people, hurt people.”

    Mitt Romney’s mean spirited National Convention, run by a team who has refined exclusion and pettiness to an art, will now rely more than ever on the socialism and failed economy of Barack Obama to get their man elected. The door of their campaign is shut for anyone else to come in. At the RNC there was NO generosity in victory, NO forgiveness, NO open arms, NO calls for unity. Only scowls. It is payback time. To an unlikely combination of evangelicals, homosexuals and other targeted groups, the pain of the Romney’s will soon be unleashed upon them.

    Now, more than ever, the choice between Obama and Romney will be “which one” do you want to ruin your country?

    • Stoutcat says:

      It would be nice if, rather than pasting a complete blog post here (your blog? Or someone else’s?), without even linking to it, if you’d include links to some evidence to support the assertions contained in the post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers