The Audacity Of Dopes: S-CHIP Claims Its First Victim

July 13, 2009


You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to know that you cannot put the burden of taxation on one industry and expect that industry to survive. But apparently our President and Congress don’t even have that much of an understanding of basic economics. But once again, they are blowing smoke up our… well, just read the following.

cigarWe now have our first business obituary as the direct result of the 700% tax increase placed on the tobacco industry to support the S-CHIP legislation. The iconic 107 year-old Hav-A-Tampa Cigar Company(located in the Tampa neighborhood known as Ybor City) announced it has no other choice but to close its factory leaving its 500 workers unemployed, all due to the 700% tax increase levied with the passage of the S-CHIP legislation.

Now before all you non-smokers smirk and and celebrate, let me paraphrase Martin Niemöller:

“When they came for the tobacco users, I remained silent, because I don’t smoke.”

Once the tobacco industry has been wiped out in this country, what makes you think for a moment Obama and his bunch of grinning idiots won’t go after a hefty tax on soft drinks, candy bars, beer, wine, ice cream and snack foods? After all, these are all ”weapons of ass destruction” in the war on obesity are they not?

For the 90% in Congress too stupid (or indifferent) to understand business economics 101, here it is in plain English: If a business has to raise the federal tax on its product by 700%, customers will simply give up the product. In the case of Hav-A-Tampa cigars, these were cigars for the average working man: high quality and, most important, affordable to those on a tight budget.  But no more. Most of their customers will simply have to stop smoking cigars.

That’s exactly what’s happening now, and the parent company of Hav-A-Tampa, J.C. Newman, has done the math. They’re finished in Tampa. Not because of the prolonged recession.  They made it through 2 World Wars and a depression. But they can’t survive the Obama administration.  So they will re-locate their cigar production, out of necessity, to an off-shore location where lower wages will help make up the difference, leaving 500 more skilled workers unemployed in Tampa.  Wanna bet that doesn’t show up in Obama’s statistics of jobs created or saved?

Eric M. Newman, president of the J.C. Newman Cigar Co. (which was founded by his grandfather in 1895), and president of the Cigar Manufacturers Association of Tampa sums it up perfectly in a local news article recently (emphasis is mine):

“Soon the factory will be gone. It is a sad day for the city of Tampa and its historic cigar industry, but the greatest tragedy is that this factory closing could have been avoided.

The deep recession has been challenging for Hav-A-Tampa, like all businesses, but the company was coping. The tipping point that pushed Hav-A-Tampa over the edge was the enormous 700 percent tax increase that Congress imposed on the cigar industry two months ago in order to expand health care for needy families.

Cigar-makers supported expanding the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. We believe everyone should have access to quality health care.

What we opposed was Congress’ decision to fund the expansion of this government program by taxing a single industry. Health care should be a shared responsibility.”

Indeed, if this program must be shoved down our throats, the burden should have been shared. However, in the typical fashion demonstrated by Obama and his lack of experience, he singled out ONE industry. Only a fool would believe a single industry could bear the costs related with his wild-eyed Utopian concept. Indeed one can only wonder was this the biggest political miscalculation since Japan attacked Pearl Harbor or was this merely a calculated smoke screen (pun intended) to destroy the tobacco industry once and for all? Mr. Newman avoided asking that question. I ask it on his behalf.  Newman continues:

“We pleaded with the leaders of Congress not to tax us out of business. We explained how a 700 percent tax increase would cost jobs and force some cigar companies to close their doors. Sadly, our pleas fell on deaf ears and what we feared has become reality. When will Congress understand that it cannot dramatically raise taxes on businesses without costing jobs?

How ironic it is that many former Hav-A-Tampa employees could soon need assistance from the very government program whose expansion cost them their jobs and health insurance in the first place.

Business is challenging enough these days. By continuing to impose additional tax increases on already burdened businesses, Congress and state legislatures could quickly decimate an entire historic industry. When will our leaders learn?”

Uh, Mr. Newman? Hopefully that lesson will be taught to Congress in the mid-term elections and to the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Many of us are counting the days.

Gerry Ashley


Taxation Without Representation

July 13, 2009


Bills, bills, bills. No, not the kind we get and pay every month–we actually tend to read those.

I mean the bills that Congress votes on.  You know, the ones they don’t write and can’t be bothered to read. It’s not new behavior, but given the amounts of money Congress is playing with these days (billions and trillions of taxpayer dollars), it behooves us to think very carefully about how well our elected officials are serving those who elected them.

Consider the following: Democratic Leader Laughs at Idea That House Members Would Actually Read Health-Care Bill Before Voting On It

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said Tuesday that the health-care reform bill now pending in Congress would garner very few votes if lawmakers actually had to read the entire bill before voting on it.

“If every member pledged to not vote for it if they hadn’t read it in its entirety, I think we would have very few votes,” Hoyer told CNSNews.com at his regular weekly news conference.

Hoyer was responding to a question from CNSNews.com on whether he supported a pledge that asks members of the Congress to read the entire bill before voting on it and also make the full text of the bill available to the public for 72 hours before a vote.

And this: Democratic Senator Predicts None of His Colleagues ‘Will Have the Chance’ to Read Final Stimulus Bill Before Vote

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) predicted on Thursday that none of his Senate colleagues would ”have the chance” to read the entire final version of the $790-billion stimulus bill before the bill comes up for a final vote in Congress.

“No, I don’t think anyone will have the chance to [read the entire bill],” Lautenberg told CNSNews.com.

As well as this:

And even this:

Also recall that we even have representatives who believe that the money used to fund the government is not actually our money at all:

Cavuto: “Where do we draw the line with our money?

Knollenberg: “It is not your money.”

Our Congress is not doing the job it was elected to do. At best, the behavior is hubristic demagoguery; at worst, it is the very epitome of taxation without representation.

Didn’t we fight a war over that a few hundred years ago?

Stoutcat


Czars and Sanity

July 11, 2009

Right now there are some 30 “czars” loose in the federal government. They answer to no one except President Obama. In an interview with Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Greta Van Susteren of Fox News pointed out the Czar Count:

“He had two czars, regulatory and Pentagon procurement czar, was Ronald Reagan’s. He had two. Bush 41 had one. Clinton had 9. Bush 43 had 12. And to date, President Obama has more than 30.”

So how bad is this really? Consider this… These czars are answerable to no-one but the President, and each will have salaries, staff, offices, cars, travel, and all the other perks of being DC insiders. I think the situation is reaching the point where many of us, both liberal and conservative want to rein in this “czar binge”. Let’s at least get Congress involved in the selection and oversight of these wizards the czars…

Wait. What? Step back and put that in perspective. We’ll find some modicum of comfort having the Congress influence the “Czar Bazaar”??? All too many of us will find it uplifting if those enlightened Congress folks (that the American people only give an 18% “good or excellent” rating) will step in and bring some degree of sobriety and sanity to the situation???

This is simple and just flat out “Texas-August-Outhouse-Rat” crazy…

Oh, well… Never mind. The damage is done.

Alan Speakman


“If You Love Freedom… Support Us”

July 11, 2009


As a follow-up to my previous post about the ongoing situation in Honduras, I see that Pajamas TV has sent film-makers Chris Burgard and Sean Fairburn to Tegucigalpa to see what’s going on.  Their latest report on the ground happens to be an excellent interview with Honduran Minority Leader Antonio Rivera.

“If you love freedom, and you don’t want Central American communism, support us.”

picture-235

Why are we not emphatically and unequivocally supporting this tiny nation in its time of need? Once again, President Obama has allowed his socialist tendencies to shine through, aligning America with thug leaders in Venezuela and Cuba, rather than with the duly elected and appointed leaders of Honduras.

Stoutcat


Cap and Tax, ObamaCare, Porkulus: Other People’s Money

July 10, 2009


When I’m out of ideas and my outrage isn’t at full boiling point, Milton Friedman always has something relevant to say:

Stoutcat


The Obligatory Michael Jackson Post

July 9, 2009
This space left intentionally blank.

Gerry Ashley


Obama In Moscow: The Running Of The Bull

July 9, 2009

 
There are, basically, two types of politicians that lie: Dumb and Smart. Both lie, but therein lies the difference:

  • A dumb politician lies constantly and eventually loses credibility when one lie contradicts another (or a true statement) previously made.
  • A smart politician lies consistently, telling the same lies the same way so many times it becomes accepted as part of history.

When you add arrogance to the mix, the politician almost always winds up moving from the “smart” category to “dumb.”  Witness Bill Clinton’s fall from, “I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky” all the way to “It would depend on what the definition of ‘is’ is.”

Welcome, now, to the transition of Emperor Barack Obama.

Pinnochiobama

Pinnochiobama

According an article at Politico.com, While in Moscow to deliver a commencement speech to an economics school on Tuesday, Obama decided to venture off-teleprompter, and offered this to the graduating class: “I don’t know if anybody else will meet their future wife or husband in class like I did, but I’m sure that you’re all going to have wonderful careers.”

Of course, all of America that wants to know every detail of “the chosen one’s” personal life knows that he met Michelle at the the Chicago law firm Sidley Austin.

At first glance, one might think, “So what’s the big deal here? Does it really matter where they met?”

The answer, of course, is no, it doesn’t matter where they met. So why lie about it? Note: I use the word “lie” because what man doesn’t remember where he met his wife?

The point is the arrogance of the man — that he feels he can re-write his personal history on a whim to fit the needs of the occasion… and assumes that no one will notice the discrepancy — or worse, won’t care.

If Obama feels the need to lie about something as trivial as how he met his wife, and on so innocuous an occasion, it makes one wonder, “What major things would he lie about? What major things has he already lied about?” Let’s see… allowing all Americans five days to examine (via the Internet) any legislation he’s going to sign? Eliminating the undue influence of lobbyists?

Welcome back to the Credibility Gap indeed.

Gerry Ashley


Flying United? Don’t Bring Your Guitar!

July 9, 2009

 
The sadly hilarious (or hilariously sad) story of a musician who flew from Halifax to Nebraska via Chicago on United Airways, witnessed his own baggage being mishandled on the tarmac, got no satisfaction from United’s customer service posse, and is now enjoying his revenge, eaten cold and going viral:

More than a year later (and unsurprisingly, only a few days after the video appeared), United has finally figured out that it’s getting a black eye and becoming a laughingstock, and has offered to have a “conversation” with the musician, Dave Carroll in order to “make it right.”

Here’s a hint, United: You break it, you buy it (or fix it).

Carroll has promised to make three videos in order to publicize this incident. I can’t wait for the second and third installments.

Note: Videos number two and three are now available here on Grand Rants as well as an exclusive interview.  Click on the links above to view them. Also, for more Grand Rants articles on Dave, just type “Dave Carroll” in the “Search” box which is to the right of the title line of this article. 

H/T: LA Times Blog

Stoutcat


Blaming Rush and Hannity For Obama’s Presidency?

July 8, 2009


If you’re like me, you wince daily at the latest Obamination from our Telepromter-In-Chief.  It amazes me that so much of the American public still hasn’t caught on to his overt agenda, given the way he sucks up to tyrants like Chavez, Putin, and others, while shying away from our traditional allies. But more on that in another rant.

It dawned on me recently that the Obama Presidency may be, believe it or not, the end-result of a couple of practical jokes gone wrong. And we can thank Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity for playing an instrumental role in winding up with an Alinsky-ite tyrant rather than a President.

How is that possible? It’s very simple: Think back about 18 months, when the longest campaign in Presidential election history was already in full stride. It was pretty much assumed the Democratic nominee would be the fulfillment of destiny meeting the ultimate entitlement, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.  It was a foregone conclusion, actually.

In their zeal to thwart all things Clinton, both Rush and Hannity came up with their own attempts to discredit Clinton.

El Rushbo

El Rushbo

Limbaugh had his “Operation Chaos” which taunted, cajoled, ridiculed, disagreed with, and in general trashed Senator Clinton every chance he got (which usually meant three hours a day). To his credit, there is no one finer than Limbaugh when it comes to having the subtlety of an angry moose in rutting season.

Meanwhile, Sean  Hannity chimed in with his own rendition called “The Stop Hillary Express.” He would essentially mirror the same issues as

Sean Hannity

Sean Hannity

Rush, but in a higher, more annoying voice, over and over and over… until, like a soap opera, I discovered I could turn off Hannity’s show for days at a time and really not miss a thing. The next time I’d turn on his show, he’d be hammering the same points, constantly reassuring us with his favorite expression in the world: “Let not your heart be troubled.”  He, too, was very convincing in his anti-Hillary campaign.

Both hosts are now very painfully aware of the expression, “Be careful what you wish for; you might just get it.”

To what extent are they responsible for the Clinton Campaign Collapse? That’s anyone’s guess.  But certainly, Clinton’s star sank faster than Michael Vick’s dogfood endorsement deal. And while they both searched for ten-foot poles to distance themselves from John McCain, one Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign hit the turbo button.  And we all know the outcome from that point on.

Now you won’t hear either of them mention this on their shows. They’ll both point out that they were just as agressive in their efforts to trivialize the candidacy of ”the man who would be King.”  And they were. But their contribution to the victory of Obama is not insignificant. Their efforts (and results) alone should be reasons the Obama administration should not feel the need to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine.

Am I being sarcastic or serious? In truth, it’s a little bit of both, just as were Limbaugh’s and Hannity’s campaigns. And I have the highest regard for both as broadcasters even though I am critical on this issue.

But every time Emperor Obama makes another apology for our success in America; every time he lies through his teeth about not raising taxes on us “little people”; every time he sides with a socialist, dictator, or mullah against the common people everywhere; and every time he drags this country closer to the point of no return regarding our national debt, I just can’t help but wonder what John McCain or another Clinton in the White House might have done. It may not have been pretty, but I’m pretty damn sure our position and credibility in the world wouldn’t be as bleak as it is, nor would our chances of being hit by an internal terrorist attack be as high.

And that’s not sarcasm. That’s a bloody serious fear.

Gerry Ashley


Palin’s Hope – I’m a Recovering Politician

July 7, 2009

sarah-palin1No doubt that Sarah Palin’s resignation was a shock to most, and all the pundits want to spin it every which way. Some say that it was the financial burden to her family and state  that did her in. Maybe it was a more “family issue.” And maybe she was simply tired of the same old politics. Many (if not most) shout that for whatever reason she bailed, the fact that she did bail will haunt her. And that’s probably true. But maybe, just maybe, there is the stuff of wild success here. Consider:

Palin spoke of her disgust with the same old politics (the complete transcript is here). Well, how about this: Imagine if Gov. Palin went before the cameras and simply said, “I’m Sarah Palin and I am a recovering politician“? I mean, what if she dumps the whole system and walks away from the GOP? Not just the GOP, but the whole shebang. After all, the independent vote is now roughly on equal footing with the Donkeys and the Elephants.

Suppose… just suppose she basically says, “Up Yours!” to the entire political machine that is DC today? And that would be an “Up Yours!” to friend and foe in Congress… A hearty “Up Yours!” to lawyers, lobbyists, unions, media, industry… “Up Yours!” to all of it – cold turkey! Imagine for a moment if Sarah Louise Palin stood in front of the cameras, the country, and the world and announced that her higher calling was to be VEEP in 2012, or POTUS in 2016, and she’d run the entire campaign herself via a blog, a forum, and social networking. What would the world do if Ms. Palin went home, studied the snot out of history, global politics, economics, and declared herself a recovering politician?

I don’t know, and I’m pretty sure it won’t happen with Palin. But it will down the road. Somewhere out there is an honest-to-God unselfish soul who will, without influence peddling, agenda, or political correctness, make the brutally hard calls when it comes to labor, housing, the economy, defense, education, energy, health care… An “untouchable” or perhaps even a recovering politician. This has to happen sooner or later if this Republic hopes not to perish from this earth.

Alan Speakman


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers